A woman’s body was found stuffed inside her car’s trunk. Now, a jury will decide whether her fiancé is to blame

OAKLAND An Alameda County jury began deliberating Wednesday whether an Oakland man beat his one-time fianc to death five years ago before stuffing her into the trunk of her car and ditching her body along an Interstate frontage road in San Leandro Alameda County prosecutors pointed to a voluminous collage of surveillance footage cell phone records and DNA evidence while making their final arguments to jurors in the situation of Richard Charles who faces second-degree murder in the March death of -year-old Anika Crane They stated it all happened while Crane visited Charles home near Mills College after which Charles allegedly enlisted an unidentified helper to dispose of her body The defendant chose to use his fists over and over and over on Anika Crane until she took her last breath Deputy District Attorney Colleen Clark explained And then the defendant took very calculated and very deliberate efforts to attempt to cover up his crime and to deflect blame away from him To Charles attorney the entire event amounted to a baseless story with little in the way of hard proof including a definitive crime scene an exact time of death or a motive That is all that it is here it s a theory of what might have happened defense attorney Miki Tal reported But there s countless holes in this This is like a puzzle with countless missing pieces Crane s disappearance five years ago garnered little in the way of broad media attention or alerts from law enforcement It took three months before administration broadcasted an arrest Her former fianc and boyfriend of years Crane and Charles had a complicated relationship and engagement administration revealed They met when she was and broke up several times over the next several years During one such split Charles fathered a child with another woman functionaries announced Their relationship eventually appeared to have ended shortly before she was last seen on March administration declared That day after Crane got off work she stopped at her grandmother s house and then visited a liquor store near Bancroft and th avenues in East Oakland Surveillance footage displayed Charles Ford F- pulling over near the store just as another man got out of Crane s car That s when Charles appeared to get out of the pickup walk by the man who had been with Crane and surprise her inside the store Both Crane and Charles then drove their own vehicles to Charles home an RV where Crane had stayed the previous night Crane was never seen alive again Over the following day surveillance footage proved Crane s Ford Fiesta repeatedly leaving and returning to Charles house during which only Charles appeared on surveillance footage around his house Charles also appeared to repeatedly dial an unnamed helper from West Oakland while allegedly spending hours cleaning his home prosecutors stated The day after Crane was last seen alive prosecutors say surveillance footage evidenced Charles loading something into the trunk of Crane s car before driving the sedan to San Leandro and leaving it there The following day Charles filed a workplace injury review for a swollen right hand that prosecutors noted appeared to be fraudulent Those are the actions of a murderer trying to cover up their crime Clark announced She lauded Crane s family for springing to action so hurriedly when Crane stopped picking up her phone and for ultimately finding particular of the last known video footage of her alive Clark specifically honed in on the fact that Charles twice narrated agents that he hadn t spoken with Crane after seeing her at the liquor store despite surveillance footage suggesting Crane drove to his home afterward Personnel also detected the tip of a blue latex glove between Crane s shoulder and the inside wall of her car s trunk which appeared to contain Charles DNA according to court testimony Charles attorney spent nearly an hour Wednesday highlighting all that prosecutors didn t show A motive almost any blood at the crime scene or any suggestion of Charles not cooperating with police He never fled Tal stressed Rather he tried calling Crane times in the four days after she vanished And Tal reported he joined Crane s mother in calling to summary her missing on March Investigators revealed almost nothing in the way of Crane s blood inside his RV save for a small amount on one of his old filthy slippers This is entirely a circumstantial evidence event Tal announced This is not story time ladies and gentlemen This is not what could have happened This is the criminal justice system and it has the highest burden of proof Tal also took issue with prosecutors maintains that Charles had a helper who guided his alleged cleaning of the crime scene She highlighted how that person was never identified or heard from at trial framing it as indicative of a half-baked episode against her client We have no idea who this person is Tal commented You have no phone content no conversations you don t even have the person s name For you to just assume it was a so-called helper makes no sense and is not what your job is Moments before the jury left to deliberate Clark pleaded for jurors to absolutely follow the evidence and return with a conviction Unanswered questions do not mean the defendant gets away with murdering Anika Crane Clark declared The defendant doesn t get rewarded for covering up his crime